Motorstar StarX 125HS vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Compare Specifications of StarX 125HS and Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Selected Bikes

Motorstar StarX 125HS
Motorstar StarX 125HS

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition
Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine 4 Stroke Over Head Valve (O.H.V) liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric / Kick Start Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition CDI TCI (digital)
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission Manual 4 speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Steel Deltabox
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 2.75-17 Tube Type 100/80-17 M/C
Rear 3.00-17 Tube Type 130/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Drum Brake Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear Drum Brake Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front -- Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear -- Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Red
Black
Monster Black


Physical Specs
Length 1910 mm 1990 mm
Width 780 mm 755 mm
Height 1020 mm 1140 mm
Weight 97 kg 142 kg
Seat Height -- 825
Wheelbase -- 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 140 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - R-Series body with Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP livery
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Aluminium swing arm for high speed stability
- Light and precise Assist & Slipper clutch
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Powerful braking system
- Wide rear tyre for sharp road holding and style
Additional Details -- Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel : 130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6238