Lifan X-Mach 125 (LF125-5M) vs Yamaha XSR 125

Compare Specifications of X-Mach 125 (LF125-5M) and Yamaha XSR 125

Selected Bikes

Lifan X-Mach 125 (LF125-5M)
Lifan X-Mach 125 (LF125-5M)

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XSR 125
Yamaha XSR 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Vertical single cylinder, air cooled, 4 stroke Liquid-cooled, OHC, 1-cylinder, 4-stroke
Engine Starting Electric/Kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Electronic fuel injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 9.5 Ps @ 7500 rpm 15 PS @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque 10 Nm @ 5500 rpm 11.5 NM @ 8,000 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 5 gears, shift with left foot Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Top Speed 90 kmph --
Display -- LCD round instrument
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 80 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 2.75-17 110/70-17 (tubeless)
Rear 3.0-17 140/70-17 (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Al-alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Drum Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 267 mm
Rear Drum Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- Upside down fork, Ø 37 mm
130mm
Rear -- Swingarm
110mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Red line
Impact yellow
Techblack


Physical Specs
Length 2010 mm 1960 mm
Width 795 mm 800 mm
Height 1033 mm 1065 mm
Weight 122 kg 140 kg
Seat Height 814 815
Wheelbase 1242 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 11 litres
Overview
About The Lifan X-Mach 125 carries a vertical single-cylinder, air-cooled, 4-stroke engine with 124.8 Read More --
Features -- - An EU5-compliant 125 engine that sets standards
- Puristic and timeless XSR style
- 37mm inverted forks
- Stylish: the tires with the block profile
- High-tech: LED headlights and rear lights
- High-strength and lightweight Deltabox frame
- Premium Features
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 2.1 litres/100 km
CO2 emission: 47g/km
Steering head angle: 26º
Trailing: 95mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7185