KOVE 800X Pro vs Yamaha Tracer 700

Compare Specifications of KOVE 800X Pro and Yamaha Tracer 700

Selected Bikes

KOVE 800X Pro
KOVE 800X Pro

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tracer 700
Yamaha Tracer 700

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 799.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine Twin cylinders, DOHC, liquid-cooled 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System EFI Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 71KW/9000rpm 72.4 PS @ 8750 RPM
Maximum Torque 80N.m/7500rpm 68.0 NM @ 6500 RPM
Transmission -- Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 210 kmph --
Display TFT Display --
Frame Diamond shape, dual-wing beam Diamond
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Pirelli, 90/90-21 120/70 R17 M/C 58W (tubeless)
Rear Pirelli, 150/70-18 180/55 R17 M/C 73W (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Dual discs, 4-piston opposed calliper/ABS Hydraulic dual disc, Ø282 mm
Rear Disc, single piston calliper/ABS Hydraulic single disc, Ø245 mm
Suspension
Front KYB, pre-load/damping adjustable Telescopic forks
Rear KYB, pre-load/damping adjustable Swingarm, (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- Icon Grey
Sonic Grey
Phantom Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2238 mm 2140 mm
Width 880 mm 806 mm
Height 1399 mm 1290 mm
Weight -- 196 kg
Kerb Weight 185 --
Seat Height 875 840
Wheelbase 1510 mm 1460 mm
Ground Clearance 275 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Twin LED projector headlights and position lamps
- Upgraded adjustable front and rear suspension
- Aerodynamic screen with single-handed adjustment
- Commanding riding position with comfortable ergonomics
- Contoured dual seat for rider and passenger comfort
- Long range autonomy
- Negative LCD display
Additional Details -- Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 4.3l/100km
CO2 emission : 100g/km
Caster angle : 24.8º
Trail : 90mm
Front travel :130 mm
Rear travel : 142 mm
Oil tank capacity : 3.0L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1494