KOVE 800X Pro vs Moto Guzzi V85 TT

Compare Specifications of KOVE 800X Pro and Moto Guzzi V85 TT

Selected Bikes

KOVE 800X Pro
KOVE 800X Pro

Brand:

Model:

Moto Guzzi V85 TT
Moto Guzzi V85 TT

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 799.00 cc 853.00 cc
Engine Twin cylinders, DOHC, liquid-cooled Transversal 90° V-twin, two valves per cylinder (titanium intake).
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System EFI --
Maximum Power 71KW/9000rpm 56 kW @ 7500 RPM (Also available at 35 kW, A2 driver license).
Maximum Torque 80N.m/7500rpm 82 NM @ 5000 RPM
Top Speed 210 kmph --
Display TFT Display Colour TFT instrument panel
Frame Diamond shape, dual-wing beam --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Pirelli, 90/90-21 19" 110/80
Rear Pirelli, 150/70-18 17" 150/70
Wheel / RIM -- Front wheel : Cross spoked tubeless wheel
Rear wheel : Cross spoked tubeless wheel
Brakes
Front Dual discs, 4-piston opposed calliper/ABS Double stainless steel floating disk 320 mm, radial Brembo calipers with 4 opposed pistons.
Rear Disc, single piston calliper/ABS Stainless steel disk 260 mm, floating 2 pistons caliper.
ABS -- Standard double channel ABS
Suspension
Front KYB, pre-load/damping adjustable Upside-down hydraulic telescopic fork Ø 41 mm, with adjustable extension and spring preload
Rear KYB, pre-load/damping adjustable Swingarm Twin-sided with lateral mono shock absorber, adjustable extension and spring preload.
Colors Available
Colors -- Nero Etna


Physical Specs
Length 2238 mm --
Width 880 mm --
Height 1399 mm --
Weight -- 209 kg
Kerb Weight 185 230
Seat Height 875 830
Wheelbase 1510 mm --
Ground Clearance 275 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 23 litres
Overview
Features -- - 5 Riding Mode (Street, Rain, Offroad, Sport, Custom)
- Cruise Control
- Handguard
- Aluminium sump guard
- MGCT
- Moto Guzzi Controllo di Trazione
- Standard double channel ABS
Additional Details -- Compliance : Meets European Directive Euro 5
Emissions : 119 g/km (CO2)
Consumption : 4,9 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4111