Kawasaki 2024 Vulcan 1700 Voyager ABS vs Lifan KPT 400 (LF400-2)

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki 2024 Vulcan 1700 Voyager ABS and KPT 400 (LF400-2)

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki 2024 Vulcan 1700 Voyager ABS
Kawasaki 2024 Vulcan 1700 Voyager ABS

Brand:

Model:

Lifan KPT 400 (LF400-2)
Lifan KPT 400 (LF400-2)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement -- 378.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 52-degree V-twin, liquid-cooled Vertical twin cylinder, 8 valve, water cooled, 4 stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric start
Fuel System TCBI with Electronic Advance Electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Water cooled
Maximum Power -- 44.8 Ps @ 9500 rpm
Maximum Torque 145 Nm 36.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Transmission 6-speed with overdrive and positive neutral finder 6 gears, hand clutched
Top Speed -- 150 kmph
Display -- TFT screen
Frame Steel, double-cradle with box-section single-tube backbone --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 130/90-16 110/70-17
Rear 170/70-16 160/60-17
Wheel / RIM -- Al-alloy wheels
Brakes
Front Dual 300mm discs, dual four-piston calipers, K-ACT ABS Disc
Rear Single 300mm disc, twin-piston caliper, K-ACT ABS Disc
ABS -- Dual channel ABS
Suspension
Front 45mm Showa telescopic fork/5.5 in Inverted and adjustable front shock absorber
Rear Swingarm with twin air-assisted shocks, with 4-way rebound damping/3.1 in Adjustable rear shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Graphite Gray/Metallic Carbon Gray --


Physical Specs
Length 2560 mm 2165 mm
Width 995.68 mm 925 mm
Height 1549.4 mm 1420 mm
Weight -- 223 kg
Kerb Weight 406 --
Seat Height 728.98 800/830
Wheelbase 1666.24 mm 1416 mm
Ground Clearance 134.62 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 18.5 litres
Overview
About -- The Lifan KPT 400 is a twin-cylinder adventure machine with a 378cc, 8-valve engine and liquid Read More
Features - Integrated audio system with SiriusXM and intercom headset compatibility
- Electronic Cruise Control
- Anti Lock Brake System
- Kawasaki Advanced Coactive Braking Technology
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1648