Husqvarna FC 250 2025 vs Kawasaki 2023 Ninja ZX-25R ABS SE

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna FC 250 2025 and Kawasaki 2023 Ninja ZX-25R ABS SE

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna FC 250 2025
Husqvarna FC 250 2025

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki 2023 Ninja ZX-25R ABS SE
Kawasaki 2023 Ninja ZX-25R ABS SE

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.90 cc 249.80 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke In-Line Four
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System -- 30 mm x 4
Ignition -- Digital
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid-cooled
Transmission 5-speed 6-speed, return
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Battery 2 Ah --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Trellis, high-tensile steel
Chain 520, Non-sealed --
Tyres
Front -- 110/70R17M/C 54H
Rear -- 150/60R17M/C 66H
Wheel / RIM Spoked wheels with aluminium rims Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake --
Rear Disc brake --
Suspension
Front WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm 37 mm inverted fork (SFF-BP) with top-out springs
Front Travel Wheel: 120 mm
Front Caliper: Radial-mount, monobloc, opposed 4-piston
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Horizontal Back-link, gas-charged shock with spring preload adjustability
Rear Travel Wheel: 116 mm
Rear Caliper: Single-piston
Colors Available
Colors -- Metallic Matte Graphene Steel Gray
Candy Persimmon Red


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 101.2 kg --
Seat Height 946 --
Wheelbase 1490 mm --
Ground Clearance 336 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.2 litres --
Overview
Features -- - Central Ram Air
- 37mm SFF-BP front suspension
- Horizontal Back-link rear suspension
- 310 mm semi-floating disc with radial-mount caliper
- NEW TFT instrumentation with Circuit Mode
- NEW Smartphone connectivity
- Kawasaki Traction Control
- Power mode selection
- Dual-direction Kawasaki Quick Shifter
- Special Edition graphics
Additional Details -- Primary Reduction Ratio: 2,900 (87/30)
Final Reduction Ratio: 3.571 (50/14)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3394