Honda Dio vs Yamaha RS Neo UBS

Compare Specifications of Honda Dio and Yamaha RS Neo UBS

Selected Bikes

Honda Dio
Honda Dio

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha RS Neo UBS
Yamaha RS Neo UBS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 109.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, SOHC, Air-Cooled Air-cooled four-stroke single-cylinder 2V
Engine Starting Kick/Electric Electric
Fuel System Carburetor --
Cooling System -- Air-cooled
Maximum Power 9 PS @ 5000 rpm --
Seating Capacity -- 2
Top Speed 90 kmph --
Battery 12V – 3 Ah MF Dry --
Display Analog Meter Digital
Headlamp LED Halogen bulb / 35W
Taillamp LED Led
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 58.3 kmpl 57.9 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90 / 100 – 10 53J (Tubeless) 90/90-10 50J
Rear 90 / 100 – 10 53J (Tubeless) 90/90-10 50J
Wheel / RIM Steel Rims Alloy
Brakes
Front Mechanical Drum Brake Disc brake / Φ180 / One-way double-piston caliper
Rear Mechanical Drum Brake Drum
Suspension
Front -- Upright front fork
Rear -- Side-mounted single rear shock
Colors Available
Colors Sports Red 2
Matte Axis Gray Metallic
Dark blue dark gray
Dark gray
Dark gray dark blue
Dark gray red
White grey


Physical Specs
Length 1781 mm 1740 mm
Width 710 mm 670 mm
Height 1133 mm 1070 mm
Weight -- 93 kg
Kerb Weight 104 --
Seat Height 765 735
Wheelbase -- 1205 mm
Ground Clearance 158 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 5.3 litres 4 litres
Overview
About The Honda Dio is a 109cc scooter with a 4-stroke, SOHC, air-cooled engine. It features an analo Read More --
Features - Front hook and retractable rear hook
- 14.4 L U-box Storage
- Combined Braking System
- Wide Dual Seats
- Wide Step Floor
- Lightweight steel frame with a weight of 93kg
- Smart Motor Generator
- BLUE CORE
- Optimized low body design
- R Series Tandem LED Tail Lights
- Full LCD pen display
- USB charging socket
- Self-raised seat cushion
Additional Details -- Front Direction Lights: Led
Rear Turn Signal: Led
Positioning Light: Led
Stopwatch: Lcd
Energy efficiency class: Level 1 (over 100c.c.~150c.c.)
Annual fuel consumption (liters): 78

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7701