Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition vs Qianjiang QJ110-9B

Compare Specifications of Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition and Qianjiang QJ110-9B

Selected Bikes

Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition

Brand:

Model:

Qianjiang QJ110-9B
Qianjiang QJ110-9B

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 109.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, air cooled 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , SOHC
Engine Starting -- Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch -- Wet Multiplate
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air cooling
Maximum Power -- 6.8 HP @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 8.3 NM @ 5250 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 4-speed spiral transmission Chain
Gear Shift Pattern -- N-1-2-3-4-N
Display -- Digital
Frame T-Bone Frame Backbone / Steel
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front -- 2.50-17Tubeless
Rear -- 2.75-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 12" Wheel --
Brakes
Front Disc 220 mm Hydraulic Disk
Rear Disc 110 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic 98 mm Telescopic
Rear -- 78 mm Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors -- Red
Black
Blue
White


Physical Specs
Length -- 1950 mm
Width -- 720 mm
Height -- 1110 mm
Kerb Weight -- 100
Seat Height -- 780
Wheelbase -- 1240 mm
Ground Clearance -- 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 4.8 litres
Overview
About Relive the 70s with the DAX 1978 SPECIAL EDITION, a mini-bike with classic Honda charm and a re Read More --
Features Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
1978 Retro Soft Emblem

Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
T-Bone Pressed Frame With 1978 Retro Design

Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
125cc Engine with Rotary Gear System

Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
Stainless Steel Rear Rack

Honda Dax 1978 Special Edition
Kitaco Front Fender Chrome and Reflector Set
- Equipped with Dual Clutch Engine for faster Acceleration and better Fuel Efficiency
- Roomy Under-Seat Compartment for 1/2 Face Helmet
- Designed for tougher using conditions and environments

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1393