Honda 2023 CRF150R vs Husqvarna 2025 TC 150

Compare Specifications of Honda 2023 CRF150R and Husqvarna 2025 TC 150

Selected Bikes

Honda 2023 CRF150R
Honda 2023 CRF150R

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2025 TC 150
Husqvarna 2025 TC 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 150.00 cc 144.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled single cylinder 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric/Kick Electric starter
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Fuel System 32mm Keihin flat-slide carburetor with Throttle Position Sensor (TPS) --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Liquid cooled
Seating Capacity 1 --
Transmission Close-ratio five-speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain Final Drive #420 chain; 15T/50T --
Battery -- 2 Ah
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Aluminum-reinforced polyamide rear frame
Handle Bar -- Pro Taper, Aluminium Dia 28/22 mm
Chain -- 520, Non-sealed
Tyres
Front Dunlop MX51;70/100-17 --
Rear Dunlop MX51; 90/100-14 --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoked wheels with aluminium rims
Brakes
Front Single 220mm disc 260 mm disc brake
Rear Single 190mm disc 220 mm disc brake
Suspension
Front 37mm leading-axle inverted Showa cartridge fork with rebound- and compression-damping adjustability; 10.8-inch travel WP XACT-USD, Dia 48 mm, 305 mm travel
Rear Pro-Link Showa single shock with spring-preload, rebound- and compression-damping adjustability; 10.7-inch travel WP XACT Monoshock with linkage, 293 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Red --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 92.8 kg
Kerb Weight 84 --
Seat Height 833 946
Wheelbase 1260 mm 1490 mm
Ground Clearance 302 mm 350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 4 litres 7.2 litres
Overview
Features - Unicam Engine
- Accelerator Pump
- Track-Designed Chassis
- Pro-Link Rear Suspension
- Showa Suspension
- Lightweight Wheels
- Big-Bike Mx Graphics
--
Additional Details - Valve Train: Unicam SOHC; four valves per cylinder
- Rake: 27.0°
- Trail: 3.1 inches
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1548