Hanyang Cruiser RL800i vs Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Compare Specifications of Cruiser RL800i and Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Selected Bikes

Hanyang Cruiser RL800i
Hanyang Cruiser RL800i

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ900P (Police)
Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 800.00 cc 892.00 cc
Engine V-type engine double cylinder Air-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC,Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Force-feed lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System EFI Carburetor
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline (Gasohol [E10] acceptable)
Ignition -- T.C.I.
Cooling System Water Cooling Air-cooled
Maximum Power 57.1 PS @ 6000 rpm 88.2 PS @ 8250 RPM
Maximum Torque 68 PS @ 5000 rpm 83.5 NM @ 7000 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4--5
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Shaft
Top Speed 160 kmph --
Battery 12V 9Ah 12 V, 12.0 Ah
Display Multifunctional 7-inch TFT LCD Screen --
Frame Split cradle frame Double cradle
Gear -- Gear ratio : 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th 2.188 (35/16), 1.500 (30/20), 1.154, (30/26), 0.933 (28/30), 0.813 (26/32)
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 140/70-ZR17 120/70-17 58V tubeless
Rear 200/50-ZR17 150/70-17 69V tubeless
Wheel / RIM 17" Wheel Front wheel travel : 140 mm
Rear wheel travel : 110 mm
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc type with double channel ABS 320 mm Dual disc
Rear Hydraulic disc type with double channel ABS 267 mm Single disc
ABS Dual channel ABS --
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic forks
Rear -- Swingarm (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Cement Gray
Dark Green
Matte Black
Bright Black
--


Physical Specs
Length 2390 mm 2230 mm
Width 870 mm 900 mm
Height 1300 mm 1490 mm
Kerb Weight 271 297
Seat Height 720 795
Wheelbase 1600 mm 1505 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 24.0 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 4.2 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.672 (97/58)
Secondary reduction ratio : 3.717 (46/38 x 19/18 x 32/11)
Caster angle : 27°
Trail : 121 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

230