Dahon Curl i4 vs Giant Cross City Disc 2 Equipped

Compare Specifications of Dahon Curl i4 and Cross City Disc 2 Equipped

Selected Bikes

Dahon Curl i4
Dahon Curl i4

Brand:

Model:

Giant Cross City Disc 2 Equipped
Giant Cross City Disc 2 Equipped

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame DAHON Patented Flip Frame with Autolatch, Dalloy Aluminum, Suspension Rear Built-In Carrier/Roller ALUXX-grade aluminium, disc
Stem -- Giant Sport, 15-degree, 31.8mm XS:80mm, S:90mm, M:90mm, L:100mm, XL:100mm
Handle Bar -- Giant Sport XC, 31.8mm
Fork Dally aluminum, integrated patented Fusion technology Alloy, rack mount, disc
Seatpost -- Giant D-Fuse, alloy
Grip -- Giant ErgoContact
Crankset -- Forged Alloy, 30/46 S:170mm, M:170mm, L:175mm, XL:175mm
Pedals -- Giant platform
Chain -- KMC Z8.3
Shifters -- Shimano CUES U4000, 9-speed
Saddle -- Giant ErgoContact
Derailleur Front -- Shimano CUES U4010
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano CUES U3020
Hub Front -- Alloy, 28h
Hub Rear -- Alloy, 28h
Spoke -- Stainless, 14g
Cassette -- Shimano CS-LG3009, 11x36
Bottom Bracket -- Cartridge
Tyres
Front -- Giant S-X2, puncture protect, 700x38c
Rear -- Giant S-X2, puncture protect, 700x38c
Wheel / RIM 349 mm Lightweight Aluminum Double Wall w/CNC & Kenda 35-349 Giant double wall aluminium
Brakes
Front TEKTRO Dual Pivot Aluminum caliper brakes Tektro HD-R280, Giant MPH rotors 160mm
Rear TEKTRO Dual Pivot Aluminum caliper brakes Tektro HD-R280, Giant MPH rotors 160mm
Brake Lever -- Tektro HD-R280
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Asphalt Green


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 12.53 kg --
Wheelbase 1040 mm --
Overview
Features - 3-point folding
- A roller rack
- 4 internal hub gears
--
Additional Details Handlepost : Radius Telescope, adjustable, patented Fusion and V-Clamp technologies, forged aluminum
Drivetrain : STUREMY-ARCHER 4-Speed w/ Revo Speed Shifter
Rider height : 140-180 cm
Max Rider Weight : 105 kg (230lb)
- Fender, rack, kickstand, 45mm max tyre size

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9736