Cleveland Cyclewerks Ace Scrambler 125 vs Yamaha R125

Compare Specifications of Cleveland Cyclewerks Ace Scrambler 125 and Yamaha R125

Selected Bikes

Cleveland Cyclewerks Ace Scrambler 125
Cleveland Cyclewerks Ace Scrambler 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125
Yamaha R125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, oil-cooled liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Pressure, splash Wet sump
Clutch Multiplate wet clutch Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System EFI Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition ECU TCI (digital)
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 7.4/8000 kw/rpm 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque 9.5/6500 nm/rpm 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission Chain drive with 5 gears Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 85 kmph --
Battery 12v-9Ah --
Frame -- Steel Deltabox
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 4.1 - 18 100/80-17 M/C
Rear 4.6 - 17 140/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front disc with ABS Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear disc with ABS Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front Standard fork Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear Twin coil over oil damped shocks Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- Icon Blue
Competition White
Tech Black


Physical Specs
Length 2100 mm 1955 mm
Width 830 mm 680 mm
Height 1025 mm 1065 mm
Weight 125 kg 142 kg
Seat Height 790 825
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1355 mm
Ground Clearance 240 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - High-tech 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Compact Deltabox frame ensures lightweight handling
- Lightweight aluminum swingarm for high speed stability
- Sleek R-series body with dual twin-eye LED headlights
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Wide 140-section rear tire for supersport handling
- Supersport specification braking system
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel :130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9191