Canyon Roadlite 5 vs Polygon Urbano 5

Compare Specifications of Canyon Roadlite 5 and Polygon Urbano 5

Selected Bikes

Canyon Roadlite 5
Canyon Roadlite 5

Brand:

Model:

Polygon Urbano 5
Polygon Urbano 5

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Aluminium hybrid frame with a comfortable, yet sporty riding position. Featuring rear rack mounts.
Axle dimension: 9X135 mm
ALX Foldable Frame w/ Safety Lock & Magnetic
Stem Iridium Stem Alloy Foldable Stem Adjustable Height:315-350mm
Handle Bar 31,8 mm dia Iridium Flatbar Alloy w: 560MM Barbore: 25.4MM Bend: 6 Degree
Fork Canyon FK0049 CF Disc
Lightweight, stiff carbon fork.
Material: Carbon (CF)
ALX Rigid Fork
Seatpost Iridium Seatpost Alloy 34.9x580mm w/ Shim to 36.4mm
Grip Ergon GA3 --
Crankset SAMOX TAM37 46T 2-Piece Alloy Crank 53T W/ Single Chain Guard
Pedals Iridium Flat Pedal Foldable PP Cage Pedal w/ Reflector
Chain KMC X11-93 KMC X9 9-Speed
Shifters Shimano Deore M5100 11s Shimano Altus SL-M2010 9-Speed
Saddle Canyon Sport Saddle EP1249 Entity Saddle
Headset -- ZS 44/28.6 | ZS 44/30
Derailleur Rear Shimano Deore M5100 11s Shimano Sora RD-R3000 9-Speed
Cassette Shimano Deore M5100 11s 11-51 Shimano CS-HG200 11-34T 9-Speed
Sprocket 11 Sprockets --
Bottom Bracket SAMOX Pressfit BB8601 Threaded BB for 2-Piece Crank
Tyres
Front Schwalbe G-One Speed 30 mm Vee Speedster 20"x1 3/8"
Rear Schwalbe G-One Speed 30 mm Vee Speedster 20"x1 3/8"
Wheel / RIM 9X100 mm Alex Rims CRD30 / Shimano TX505
9X135 mm Alex Rims CRD30 / Shimano TX505 SH11
20" Alloy Double Wall 28H
Brakes
Front Shimano MT200 / UR300​, 160 mm Shimano RT10 Rotor Hydraulic Disc Brake Caliper IS
Rear Shimano MT200 / UR300​, 160 mm Shimano RT10 Rotor Hydraulic Disc Brake Caliper IS
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Light Grey Blue
Green


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Handlebar Width 600 --
Overview
About The Canyon Roadlite 5 is a bicycle designed with a lightweight carbon fork for enhanced stiffne Read More --
Features -- --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3793